Comparison of Non-Vegetarians and Vegetarians Essay - 2

Comparison of Non-Vegetarians and Vegetarians - Essay Example Being a vegetarian or non-vegetarian is an individual’s decision. Both categories have their individualistic pros and cons. The desire to be a vegetarian comes from a myriad of sources which include a wish to stay healthy, live green and remain smart. There is a general perception that consumption of vegetarian food keeps one’s weight in control because of the reduced intake of fat. There is a significant population of vegetarians who consider it unlawful to slaughter animals or birds to eat them irrespective of the prevailing laws in the country. They consider it wrong ethically. According to them, just because humans have more brains and power as compared to other animals and birds does not deprive other species of their right to survival and existence. Being a vegetarian deprives an individual of a whole range of foods that are made of meat. Accordingly, the range of flavors with which the vegetarians can play to develop different tastes in different dishes is limite d. Vegetarians are generally smarter as compared to the non-vegetarians because some of the most common and potential sources of fat including butter and cream that are derived from animals are excluded from their diet. Research suggests that vegetarians, both men, and women, have a higher IQ level as compared to the non-vegetarians (BBC, 2006). The desire to be a non-vegetarian fundamentally emerges from the love of meat, though there are also other factors that play a role including a wish to stay healthy and strong. There is a general perception that consumption of non-vegetarian food facilitates the development of muscles and lends the body more muscular strength. Non-vegetarians do not consider it ethically wrong to slaughter animals and birds to eat them.